Introduction
Every matrimonial journey starts with a shared vision, with the matrimonial home often being its heart and soul. The matrimonial home is much more than a mere building; it's a love nest with shared experiences and memories, symbolising the physical testament to the couple's unity. However, when the harmony of marriage starts to unravel, leading to the rocky road of divorce, this once treasured love nest, known as a matrimonial home, quickly becomes a contested asset in a divorce proceeding. Then the following pressing question is: who will get the matrimonial home?
In the intricate maze of divorce proceedings, the destiny of the matrimonial home often emerges as a contentious point, tangled in a whirl of emotional, financial, and legal implications. This question carries considerable weight because, for most married couples, the matrimonial home is usually the most expensive asset they owned. as it stretches beyond just property ownership, often involving aspects of stability, consistency, and equity.
In this article, we delve into the Malaysian legal landscape as it relates to the determination of the matrimonial home in the face of divorce, intending to shed light on the underlying principles that inform the final verdict. Our expedition will steer us through the elaborate pathways of the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Act 1976, as we explore its past amendments and its present bearing on the division of matrimonial home.
Matrimonial Assets Division: The Principles
The division of matrimonial assets for divorce between non-Muslims is governed by the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Act 1976 ("the Act"). The act underscores the principles of matrimonial property division, which have evolved over time towards greater fairness and inclusivity.
Prior to the Amendment of the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Act 1976
Prior to the amendment of the Act the division of matrimonial assets between spouses was determined based on whether financial contributions were made towards acquiring the property.
Joint Contribution
In instances where the matrimonial property was purchased during the marriage with the combined efforts of both spouses, the court tended to favour a balanced division. This inclination towards equality, however, did not necessarily mean the court would automatically order a fifty-fifty split. Rather, the court would lean towards an equal division, bearing in mind the nature and degree of contributions made by each party.
Solo Contribution
On the other hand, if the matrimonial asset was procured during the marriage due to the sole efforts of one spouse, the court could divide the assets or the sale proceeds in such proportions as it deemed fit but, the spouse whose efforts led to the acquisition of the assets was generally entitled to a larger share.
This principle often disadvantaged spouses who contributed non-financially, such as managing the home or caring for the family, or made indirect financial contributions i.e. purchase of the groceries or payment of utilities.
Current Position: After Amendment by the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Amendment Act 2017 ("the Amendment Act")
Following the amendment of the Act, the court is no longer required to consider whether the matrimonial asset was acquired through the joint or sole effort in determining the division of such an asset. It tilted the scales towards considering both financial and non-financial contributions, recognising the value of homemaker roles, the needs of the children and the duration of the marriage.
Who Gets the Matrimonial Home?
Determining Residency of the Matrimonial Home
If both spouses during the divorce proceedings challenge each other for the right to reside in the matrimonial home, the court is then tasked to determine who gets to stay in the matrimonial house post-divorce.
Needs of Minor Children
In the realm of divorce proceedings, the issue of determining the residency of the matrimonial home can become a complicated knot to untangle, particularly when minor children are involved. The welfare and needs of these young ones can significantly influence the court's decision-making process.
From a standpoint of general understanding, children, especially those who are still minors, thrive best in a stable, consistent, and familiar environment. The matrimonial home often represents these elements, filled with memories, comfort, and a sense of belonging. Hence, during a divorce, the court weighs heavily on these considerations, aiming to reduce the impact of the separation on the children as much as possible.
Children's Best Interest
The principle guiding the court's decision is the child's best interest. The court leans towards granting residency in the matrimonial home to the parent who is appointed as the primary caretaker or, in legal terms, the custodial parent. This decision ensures that the child continues to live in a familiar environment, thus providing a sense of continuity and normalcy during a time that is otherwise filled with confusion and emotional turmoil.
Children's Age
However, this is not a straightforward or automatic decision. The court looks into various aspects before determining who should stay in the matrimonial home. Key among these factors is the child's age. Younger children may need the constant presence and care of a parent, usually the mother. But it doesn't necessarily mean that mothers will always be granted residency; the court will consider which parent has been more involved in day-to-day responsibilities like feeding, schooling, and general upbringing.
Proximity from School
The court also considers the child's educational needs. If the matrimonial home is situated close to the child's school or other educational facilities, it may serve the child's best interests to maintain their residence in that home. Disrupting their educational routine or forcing them to change schools, especially in the middle of an academic year, could have a negative impact on the child's progress and emotional well-being.
Emotional Factors
The emotional attachments of the child also carry weight in the court's considerations. For example, if the child has an emotional attachment to the home because of factors like proximity to friends or other family members, the court will take this into consideration. The overall aim is to reduce the impact of the divorce on the child's emotional well-being.
Health Factors
Health considerations also play a crucial role in court decisions. If a child has specific health issues that require access to nearby medical facilities, the court may be more inclined to allow the custodial parent and child to continue residing in the matrimonial home.
To summarise, the question of who gets to stay in the matrimonial home in the event of a divorce involving minor children is not a simple one. It is a careful balancing act that takes into account multiple factors, all of which revolve around ensuring the child's well-being. As a parent, ensuring you have legal representation to effectively present your case and these considerations is key to navigating through this complex process. Divorce is undoubtedly a challenging phase, but the focus should always remain on cushioning the impact on the most vulnerable members – the children.
Other factors
In the absence of minor children in a divorce, the court, in deciding residency of the matrimonial home is tasked to examine factors put forward by your divorce lawyer in the pleadings or application.
Your Lawyer
It's crucial to remember that a significant part of getting the court to see things your way, whether it's about deciding who stays in the matrimonial home or any other issue, greatly depends on how your divorce lawyer drafts the prayer. The court is tasked to examine a myriad of factors put forward by your lawyer. It's crucial to remember that a significant part of getting the court to see things your way, whether it's about deciding who stays in the matrimonial home or any other issue, greatly depends on what you asked and how your divorce lawyer convinces the court.
So, it's crucial that you maintain an open line of communication with your divorce lawyer, expressing your concerns candidly. It's equally important to provide all the relevant details they asked of you, to bolster your case. Remember, your lawyer is there to advocate for you, but they can only do so effectively if they have all the necessary information.
To schedule a preliminary consultation with us, click the button below.
About the Author
Dato' Fion Wong is the founder of Fion Wong a law firm in Malaysia specialising in Matrimonial & Family Law. She is a licensed master practitioner in Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) established as the original, official certifying body in the field of NLP by NLP Co-Developers, Richard Bandler and John Grinder. She is also pursuing psychotherapy to bring a unique and resourceful perspective to family law. Dato' Fion Wong is also an esteemed author, having published a highly regarded reference on family law (Handbook on Family Law Practice in Malaysia: Commentary, Procedures & Forms) referred to by fellow family law practitioners and judges and other influential publications that are widely recognised.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content is based on the author's understanding and interpretation of the subject matter at the time of writing. Laws and regulations regarding divorce may vary depending on the jurisdiction and individual circumstances. Readers are advised to consult with a qualified legal and medical professional or seek appropriate professional advice before making any legal decisions or taking action based on the information provided in this article. The author and the publisher disclaim any liability for any loss or damage incurred by readers as a result of their reliance on the information contained herein.
Comments